Make a tax deductible payment 
Did the House Recess Because of Bomb Scares and Before Oath Keepers were encouraged to walk in through the East Door?
Counselor Jonathan Moseley makes a very strong filing on behalf of Kelly Meggs (and most all January Sixer defendants who entered through the East Door–opened from the inside, possible by those invited or let inside the Capitol by police).
Counselor Moseley points out in his exquisitely presented and researched motion that Kelly Meggs is sufficiently likely to show that the evidence requested by US Capitol, is specifically identified, shown to be relevant and likely admissible because the basis for why and when the USCP advised the two chambers to recess.
Moseley demands that the Government show the Defendants all relevant discovery so that they can determine if Meggs, who is alleged to have “interfered” with the subject “proceeding” actually interfered with the subject proceeding. This Requested Information strikes at the core of the allegations against these and almost all other Defendants.
The Government argues that the subpoena demanded would circumvent the on-going
discovery process while it floods defense counsel with useless and irrelevant material under
the show of complying with Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963).
Please Donate to One of our Generous Sponsors So We Can Continue Our Work